I read books about witchcraft fairly regularly. Some are the scholarly, historical type books, others are written by witches and Wiccans and are full of spells, rituals, history of dubious accuracy, and other odds and ends. Some of these books are written by well known, respected scholars and witches, others are relative nobodys. A few are people that I firmly believe are completely full of shit. Regardless, I find that most of these have something to teach me, and this is true for the two books I'm going to talk about here, but I do have some issues with these books.
Another caveat; if you found either of these books useful, that's a good thing. I don't think you're an idiot for enjoying and using what you find in these books. I'm just putting my opinion out there.
These two books are “The Witch's Sabbath”, and “The Crooked Path”. I read both of these books last fall.

Both of these books are written by Kelden, who is revered and respected in a lot of circles. I'm still on the fence about him, and these books, for one reason. That is the idea of the witch's sabbath itself. I'm aware that over the last century, witches did begin getting together for actual, in person Witch's Sabbaths. What goes on at these gatherings varies, and can be anything from dinner, games and rituals to more historically inspired gatherings with lots of nudity.
The historical records of the Witch's Sabbath is where I take issue. The descriptions and the very idea of the Witch's Sabbath is not something born out of witchcraft. Rather, the very name, and the stories of orgies, cannibalism, and the presence of Satan, are all the results of testimony coerced from suspected witches via torture, over the course of hundreds of years. The people, who may or may not have actually been witches (certainly not the Christian idea of a witch), they were basically told what to admit to, what details to describe, and then tortured until they did. This sometimes went on for weeks. I don't need to go into the problems with testimony procured via torture, and I'll only mention that most modern court systems have very strict laws against prompting witnesses, because neither of these produces reliable testimony. Torture a person long enough, or even scare a person in the right way, and they'll admit to anything you tell them to.
The testimony of children in the McMartin trial in the 80s is a perfect example of what you get when you subtly prompt people during interrogation. The testimony entered into official court evidence included stories of the McMartins dressing up as pumpkins and shooting children with shotguns. If you ever get a chance to read up on the McMartin trial, it's a terrifying example of what went on during the satanic panic, and what is slowly gaining traction again today. The tactics by the church and the authorities hasn't changed all that much in the last thousand years. If they could get away with torture, they would. But yeah, digressing.
Many times, in both of these books, Kelden frequently references such testimony as evidence, and as a basis for many of his ideas. This... bothers me.
Prior to the witch craze (there were several, a few hundred years apart, in Europe during the second millennia), the Witch's Sabbath was not a thing. Yeah, folk magic practitioners, pagans, various cults, what-have-you got together for lots of different reasons, but the idea of witches using the fat from unbaptized babies to make a flying ointment, rubbing it on a broom or stick, or behind their ears or wherever, and flying to meet Satan and their fellow witches, where they would have orgies, eat babies, sacrifice children and animals, and whatever other ridiculous bullshit, came from Christians, not witches, and many Christians still believe these things to this day. Pizzagate, and most all the other horse shit wrapped up in the Qanon movement, is evidence of this. Again, the tactics and the stories haven't changed all that much in the last thousand years.
Getting back to the testimony that Kelden references, no part of any of that was ever a thing. This was all made up by the church and witch hunters, and corroborated by victims of torture, because they were being crushed between large rocks, flayed, flogged, burned, stretched, and any number of other terrifying and barbaric methods of medieval torture.
In fact, everything about the Witch's Sabbath was specifically antithetical to Christianity. Even the use of the word “sabbath” implies that they're making a mockery of the Judeo-Christian sabbath. They claimed that at these meetings, not only would Satan be in attendance, but people would be urinating and defecating on bibles, performing perversions of Catholic rites like Eucharist and communion, reciting the lord's prayer backwards, and many other things meant to blaspheme, and be the antithesis of God, Christ, and Christianity.
The fact that actual witches, and their predecessors, did not believe in anything having to do with Christianity, heaven, hell, god, or the devil, negates all of this. In fact, many of the traditions and beliefs that eventually became modern witchcraft, predate the Abrahamic religions by hundreds, possibly thousands of years. So why would any of those things be included in their ceremonies? The simple answer is they wouldn't, and they weren't. It was all made up by the church and psychopathic witch hunters.
Moving on.
In Kelden's books, an “actual” Witch's Sabbath is portrayed as an entirely spiritual event. An out of body, astral meeting, attended via spirit flight, where they eat, dance, learn and celebrate. This is also derived from the testimony of tortured men and women, when it couldn't be proved that they actually flew, or had even gone anywhere on the night in question, because they often had credible alibis. For me, the fact that Kelden references such testimony, again casts serious doubts on many of his ideas.
Again, I did find some things in these books useful, and there is quite a bit of history that is corroborated by recognized historians. They are a mixed bag, but for anyone just getting started in witchcraft, or who just wants to learn about it, I don't recommend either of these books.
#Witchcraft
-Tom Blueleaf